Gun Control Essays (1365 words) - Gun Politics In The United States

Gun Control The Second Amendment to the Constitution states that, A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and the definition of gun control is; government regulation of possession and use of firearms by private citizens(Levinson, 5). Gun control only takes guns away from law-abiding citizens and it does nothing to stop criminals from buying illegal guns, who are unlikely to obey the law and register their guns(NRA 238). I feel that the term gun control is improperly used. The government is using it as a way to take our right to bear arms. Why would anyone want to own a gun? Piece of mind is the main reason I have a gun. I feel a lot safer at home knowing that I am close to my best line of defense. Guns provide a source of psychological reassurance even among citizens who are not especially concerned about the fear of crime of being victimized(Firearms 64). In a survey given about guns, self-d efense was the primary reason given by one out of every five gun owners for firearms(Firearms 61). The right of self-defense and the right to use firearms for defense of self and family are the cornerstone of individual rights enumerated in the US Constitution(Self-Defense 26). Why does the government make it harder to protect ourselves? Police cannot always protect everyone. There are only about 500,000 police officers throughout the country, which figures to around only 125,000 police officers are on duty at any given time to protect the whole country(Lee 9). Only seventeen percent of Americans give the police a great deal of confidence in protecting them, while forty-six percent said they do not give them very much confidence(Carrying 32). Other than a bodyguard or a law enforcement officer at ones side twenty-four hours a day, the most effective deterrent to criminal attack is the criminals fear that the prospective victim is armed and prepared to defend him or her self(Carrying 33). Courts have ruled that there is no constitutional right to be protected by the state against being murdered by criminals or madmen, which means that police have no duty to protect the individual citizen(Tahmassebi 66). After hearing this, I trust the police even less. What is the likelihood of being successfully attacked when you are armed? Criminals fear armed citizens(Self-Defense 22). Victims who used guns for protection were less likely either to be attacked or injured than victims who responded in any other way, including those who didnt resist at all; and victims no resisted robbers with a gun were less likely to lose their property. When victims use guns to resist crimes, the crimes usually are disrupted and the victims are not injured(Self-Defense, 24). A good example of firearm deterrence comes from a rape experiment done in Orlando. Orlando offered a training course to women on hand-gun self defense, which was taken by 6,000 women(Firearms 64). A year after the progr am began, the rape rate in Orlando dropped almost ninety percent(Firearms 64). The police force went on strike in Albuquerque, New Mexico; during this time, the crime rate decreased because frightened citizens armed themselves and protected their homes and businesses(Firearms 69). Criminals had no stomach at all for facing indignant citizens protecting their own property with the same force the criminals used to steal it(Firearms 69). Handgun ownership averts thousands of victim injuries and deaths that would not have been avoidable given the tactical advantages that criminals have over unarmed citizens(Lee 7). Who would you rather have protecting you? In Chicago in a typical year, more criminals are shot by store owners and other armed citizens than by the entire police force(Firearms 69). In April 1984 three terrorists attacked a cafe in Jerusalem with automatic weapons, intending to kill everyone in sight; they were able to claim only one victim before they were shot by a handgun -armed Israelis(Lee 3). In 1980, between 1,500-3,000 felons were legally killed by armed civilians in self-defense or for related-legally justified reasons; and additional 8,700-16,600 criminals were legally wounded under the same circumstances. If these figures are accurate, then civilians kill and injure far more

Ozone Depletion...Give Me a Break! This essay explains the myths and rumors about ozone depletions and CFCs. It has much information, but lacks sources. One of my better controversial papers.

Ozone Depletion...Give Me a Break! This essay explains the myths and rumors about ozone depletions and CFCs. It has much information, but lacks sources. One of my better controversial papers. Some scientists have proclaimed that the human race is slowly depleting the layer of ozone which protects us from ultra violet light. In reality, humans have very little control of the world in which we live. Scientific evidence has shown that there is very little depletion in the ozone layer and the contributions the human race makes towards this depletion is and always will be insignificant compared to nature. The theories of the depletion and what it would cause are flawed and contradictory. Where and when did this global killing threat begin? It all began in the mid 1960's when the United States government began pursuing super sonic transports. These would be planes which would travel in the stratosphere, very close to the ozone layer. The first environmentalist complaints were actually of the noise factor. These large planes would be traveling in excess of the speed of sound. Subsequently there would be sonic booms heard on the surface (Singer).Lowest value of ozone measured by TOMS each year i...The arguments fell on deaf ears in Washington.The next objection came in the form of ozone depletion. A fleet of over 500 of these planes would ultimately destroy the ozone. This would allow more ultra violet radiation to fall to the earth and in turn skin cancer rates would sky rocket. That was more than enough for the federal government to get involved, they immediately canceled the project. At that time there was no study done to investigate these claims, but there has been since. The initial estimation was that a fleet of 500 SSTs would effectively reduce the ozone layer seventy percent. In the 1970's that number fell to ten percent. With the emergence of the Concorde, which is a SST, in the 1980's, studies were done that show the emissions from these planes actually insulate the ozone layer...